Analytic Versus Computational Cognitive Models: Agent-Based Modeling as a Tool in Cognitive Sciences

21Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Computational cognitive models typically focus on individual behavior in isolation. Models frequently employ closed-form solutions in which a state of the system can be computed if all parameters and functions are known. However, closed-form models are challenged when used to predict behaviors for dynamic, adaptive, and heterogeneous agents. Such systems are complex and typically cannot be predicted or explained by analytical solutions without application of significant simplifications. In addressing this problem, cognitive and social psychological sciences may profitably use agent-based models, which are widely employed to simulate complex systems. We show that these models can be used to explore how cognitive models scale in social networks to calibrate model parameters, to validate model predictions, and to engender model development. Agent-based models allow for controlled experiments of complex systems and can explore how changes in low-level parameters impact the behavior at a whole-system level. They can test predictions of cognitive models and may function as a bridge between individually and socially oriented models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Madsen, J. K., Bailey, R., Carrella, E., & Koralus, P. (2019). Analytic Versus Computational Cognitive Models: Agent-Based Modeling as a Tool in Cognitive Sciences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419834547

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free