This chapter addresses the contribution that the delusion literature has made to the philosophy of belief. Three conclusions will be drawn: (1) a belief does not need to be epistemically rational to be used in the interpretation of behaviour; (2) a belief does not need to be epistemically rational to have significant psychological or epistemic benefits; (3) beliefs exhibiting the features of epistemic irrationality exemplified by delusions are not infrequent, and they are not an exception in a largely rational belief system. What we learn from the delusion literature is that there are complex relationships between rationality and interpretation, rationality and success, and rationality and knowledge.
CITATION STYLE
Bortolotti, L. (2018). Delusions and three myths of irrational belief. In Delusions in Context (pp. 97–116). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97202-2_4
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.