Evaluation of a commercial phantom and pork meat model for simulation based training of ultrasound guided intravenous catheterisation

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Establishing intravenous access is a common procedure being performed in the emergency department. Ultrasound guidance is useful for difficult intravenous cannulation. We compared a commercially available Blue Phantom™ and a self-made pork meat model for suitability of simulation based training. Methods: We recruited emergency physicians from two public regional hospitals in our locality. We also recruited Myanmar emergency physicians from an ultrasound course. They were given a 30-minute handson practice on both phantoms. Questionnaires, which asked about the practical feeling and overall impression of both phantoms, were distributed afterwards. Results: Thirty-nine emergency physicians with varied experience in ultrasound guided intravenous catheterisation enrolled in the study. The median score were 4 (i.e. agree) in seven out of eight pairs of questions. The practical feeling and overall personal impression were very similar between Blue Phantom™ and pork meat model. Conclusions: The suitability of self-made pork meat model was similar to Blue Phantom™ for the training of ultrasound guided IV catheterisation. Pork meat model can used as an alternative training tool.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leung, K. Y., Mok, K. L., Yuen, C. K., Wong, Y. T., & Kan, P. G. (2016). Evaluation of a commercial phantom and pork meat model for simulation based training of ultrasound guided intravenous catheterisation. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 23(3), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/102490791602300304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free