Review article: Bed bug detection: Current technologies and future directions

43Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Technologies to detect bed bugs have not kept pace with their global resurgence. Early detection is critical to prevent infestations from spreading. Detection based exclusively on bites is inadequate, because reactions to insect bites are non-specific and often misdiagnosed. Visual inspections are commonly used and depend on identifying live bugs, exuviae, or fecal droplets. Visual inspections are inexpensive, but they are time-consuming and unreliable when only a few bugs are present. Use of a dog to detect bed bugs is gaining in popularity, but it can be expensive, may unintentionally advertise a bed bug problem, and is not foolproof. Passive monitors mimic natural harborages; they are discreet and typically use an adhesive to trap bugs. Active monitors generate carbon dioxide, heat, a pheromone, or a combination to attract bed bugs to a trap. New technologies using DNA analysis, mass spectrometry, and electronic noses are innovative but impractical and expensive for widespread use. Copyright © 2013 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vaidyanathan, R., & Feldlaufer, M. F. (2013, April). Review article: Bed bug detection: Current technologies and future directions. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.12-0493

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free