The STEM pipeline: pathways and influences on participation and achievement of equity groups

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Skills in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) are promoted by the Australian government as pivotal for Australia’s economic prosperity. Research on equity groups suggests that group membership is associated with several factors linked to ‘leakage’ from the STEM pipeline of school, university and transition to work. In this paper we draw on longitudinal Australian data to understand what factors influence the participation of equity group students in university STEM courses, and to explore how the STEM pathways of those groups differ from those of non-equity students. We identified several important factors which influence participation at two critical points of the STEM pipeline; transition from school into university, and transition from university into the STEM workforce. Our results indicated that higher levels of mathematics self-concept and instrumental valuing of mathematics in early adolescence predict continuation in the STEM pathway for all students and particularly those from low socioeconomic status backgrounds.

References Powered by Scopus

Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics

761Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields

603Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Role of Parents and Teachers in the Development of Gender-Related Math Attitudes

509Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Student access to higher education through alternative pathways and differences by equity group and discipline

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

STEMming the tide: New perspectives on careers and turnover

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing Attitudes Toward Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) for Enhancing Creativity in Secondary Education

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Edwards, D., Buckley, S., Chiavaroli, N., Rothman, S., & McMillan, J. (2023). The STEM pipeline: pathways and influences on participation and achievement of equity groups. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 45(2), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2023.2180169

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

67%

Chemical Engineering 1

17%

Psychology 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free