Assessment and correction of B1-induced errors in magnetization transfer ratio measurements

60Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) is strongly related to the field strength (B1) of the saturation pulse. B1 variations therefore can result in significant MTR variations and can affect histogram analysis, particularly if data from a large volume of interest are included. A multicenter study was performed to determine the typical range of B1 errors and the corresponding MTR variations in brain tissue of healthy volunteers. Seven subjects were included at each center resulting in a total cohort of 28 subjects. Additionally, numerical simulations were done to study this relationship more generally for pulsed saturation. It could be demonstrated, both theoretically and empirically, that for typical B1 errors there is a linear relationship between B1 error and the corresponding MTR change. In addition, for proton density-weighted sequences, this relationship seems to be largely independent of the underlying relaxation properties. Mean B1 errors in the entire brain were typically in the range between -3% and -7%. Due to different coil characteristics, significant MTR differences between different scanners and sites were observed. Using a simple correction scheme that is based on a linear regression analysis between MTR and B1 data it was possible to reduce the intersubject variation by ∼50%. Furthermore, interscanner variation could be reduced such that no significant differences between scanners could be detected. The correction scheme may be useful when investigating MTR as an outcome measure in single or multicenter studies. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ropele, S., Filippi, M., Valsasina, P., Korteweg, T., Barkhof, F., Tofts, P. S., … Fazekas, F. (2005). Assessment and correction of B1-induced errors in magnetization transfer ratio measurements. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 53(1), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20310

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free