Enveloping pedagogies: The codification of instructional technologies

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A multitude of new technologies and curricula are being introduced in schools as the panacea for equalizing student differences and facilitating student success. However, we can find a pattern in how teachers have historically employed instructional innovations in the spaces of their classrooms. This article examines the manner in which two White elementary teachers codify instructional technologies with institutional systems of knowledge. Drawing on poststructuralist theories of discourse and practice, the author analyses the speech acts and pedagogical practices of these teachers to identify the process and knowledge in which they codify instructional resources with a psychological/individual discourse in order to give them meaning. The article illuminates how the social practice of codifying curriculum materials, computer technology and texts within this system of reasoning bounds how instructional resources can be used, and by whom. Furthermore, the analysis builds upon other empirical work to describe the entwinement of the codes that envelop instructional technologies and those that inscribe subjectivities upon students. © 2002 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

References Powered by Scopus

Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?

498Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Teacher Beliefs and Intentions Regarding the Implementation of Science Education Reform Strands

238Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Equity and Computers in the Schools: A Decade of Research

170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buendía, E. (2002). Enveloping pedagogies: The codification of instructional technologies. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 10(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360200200150

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

63%

Arts and Humanities 1

13%

Psychology 1

13%

Mathematics 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free