Book review: This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture

  • Menon P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article uses a social capital framework to examine whether and how the use of three types of publicly accessible social media (LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook) is related to professional informational benefits among a representative sample of Dutch online users. Professional informational benefits were conceptualized as the (timely) access to relevant information and being referred to career opportunities. The effect of content and structure of the respective online network on professional informational benefits was examined on the general (users vs. non-users of a platform) and more finegrained level (within users of a specific platform). Overall, users of LinkedIn and Twitter reported higher informational benefits than non-users, whereas the Facebook users reported lower informational benefits. Posting about work and strategically selecting ties consistently predicted informational benefits. The network composition mattered most on LinkedIn; strong and weak ties predicted informational benefits. The results demonstrate the usefulness of the social capital framework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menon, P. (2017). Book review: This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 205630511771627. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117716275

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free