Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is predictive for the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. We evaluated the performance, sensitivity, and concordance between five EGFR tests. Materials and methods: DNA admixtures (n = 34; 1%-50% mutant plasmid DNA) and samples from NSCLC patients [116 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, 29 matched bronchofiberscopic brushing (BB) cytology, and 20 additional pleural effusion (PE) cytology samples] were analyzed. EGFR mutation tests were PCR-Invader®, peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp, direct sequencing, Cycleave™, and Scorpion Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS)®. Analysis success, mutation status, and concordance rates were assessed. Results: All tests except direct sequencing detected four mutation types at ≥1% mutant DNA. Analysis success rates were 91.4%-100% (FFPE) and 100% (BB and PE cytology), respectively. Inter-assay concordance rates of successfully analyzed samples were 94.3%-100% (FFPE; kappa coefficients: 0.88-1.00), 93.1%-100% (BB cytology; 0.86-1.00), and 85.0%-100% (PE cytology; 0.70-1.00), and 93.1%-96.6% (0.86-0.93) between BB cytology and matched FFPE. Conclusions: All EGFR assays carried out comparably in the analysis of FFPE and cytology samples. Cytologyderived DNA is a viable alternative to FFPE samples for analyzing EGFR mutations. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Goto, K., Satouchi, M., Ishii, G., Nishio, K., Hagiwara, K., Mitsudomi, T., … Todo, T. (2012). An evaluation study of EGFR mutation tests utilized for non-small-cell lung cancer in the diagnostic setting. Annals of Oncology, 23(11), 2914–2919. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds121
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.