Wealth, slaveownership, and fighting for the confederacy: An empirical study of the American civil war

8Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

How did personal wealth and slaveownership affect the likelihood Southerners fought for the Confederate Army in the American Civil War? On the one hand, wealthy Southerners had incentives to free-ride on poorer Southerners and avoid fighting; on the other hand, wealthy Southerners were disproportionately slaveowners, and thus had more at stake in the outcome of the war. We assemble a dataset on roughly 3.9 million free citizens in the Confederacy and show that slaveowners were more likely to fight than non-slaveowners. We then exploit a randomized land lottery held in 1832 in Georgia. Households of lottery winners owned more slaves in 1850 and were more likely to have sons who fought in the Confederate Army. We conclude that slaveownership, in contrast to some other kinds of wealth, compelled Southerners to fight despite free-rider incentives because it raised their stakes in the war's outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hall, A. B., Huff, C., & Kuriwaki, S. (2019). Wealth, slaveownership, and fighting for the confederacy: An empirical study of the American civil war. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 658–673. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000170

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free