Hybrid Identities and the ‘One-way Street’ of Assimilation

  • Bell A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The most remarkable, but frequently taken-for-granted, feature of the politics of hybridity in settler societies is that hybridity is an indigenous ‘problem’ only. Like race — and for related, highly racialized reasons — hybridity is not a problem for the settler. Despite the many sources of hybridity within the settler population (mixed descent and histories of migration and of culture contact with indigenous and other peoples), a century after the eugenist anxieties about white racial purity it seems that white settler identities have become sponges that can typically absorb any amount of cultural difference.1 As Sara Ahmed (2000: 189, n4) argues, hybridization is typically not a problem for white subjectivities constructed in terms of dynamism and pliability. In the excerpt above from her poem ‘Making Aborigines’, the Australian Aboriginal poet, Anita Heiss, draws attention to this discrepancy in the assignation of hybridity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bell, A. (2014). Hybrid Identities and the ‘One-way Street’ of Assimilation. In Relating Indigenous and Settler Identities (pp. 58–89). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313560_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free