Business model canvas and energy enterprises

14Citations
Citations of this article
214Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

So far, little is known about the Business Model Canvas development in the energy sector. In this paper, we fill this knowledge gap and modify the Business Model Canvas. Based on the cause–effect analysis combined with the literature searching method, we suggest that Osterwalder’s Canvas for energy enterprise should be modified because the available Canvas adaptations cannot fully capture the energy enterprise’s business model or realise its business operations combined with the public interest. We propose a new original Canvas adaptation by adding two crucial blocks representing the mission, energy accountability, and impact on stakeholders in the Business Model Canvas. The findings make two main contributions. First, they contribute to developing entrepreneurship theory. We formulate an original definition of a business model, first showing the limitations of current definitions. We verify Chesbrough’s functions of business models. Second, compared to earlier business model frameworks, the new model clearly points out that accountability in firms’ everyday businesses is at the core of business development. Moreover, this article formulates future research avenues in the energy sector and provides a helpful planning tool for practitioners.

References Powered by Scopus

5166Citations
33093Readers
Get full text

Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution

5093Citations
5664Readers
Get full text

Value creation in e-business

3558Citations
18717Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dobrowolski, Z., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2021). Business model canvas and energy enterprises. Energies, 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217198

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250306090120

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

49%

Lecturer / Post doc 16

31%

Researcher 7

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 25

57%

Engineering 10

23%

Computer Science 5

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0