Comparing end-of-life care of hematologic malignancy versus solid tumor patients in a tertiary care center

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare end-of-life (EOL) care for solid tumor and hematologic malignancy (HM) patients. Methods: We collected data on the last 100 consecutive deceased HM and 100 consecutive deceased solid tumor patients who died prior to June 1st 2020, treated at a single center. We compared demographic parameters, cause of death as ascertained by review of medical records by two independent investigators, and EOL quality indicators including: place of death, use of chemotherapy or targeted/biologic treatment, emergency department visits as well as hospital, inpatient hospice and Intensive Care Unit admissions and the time spent as inpatient over the last 30 days of life; mechanical ventilation and use of blood products during the last 14 days of life. Results: In comparison with solid tumor patients, HM patients more commonly died from treatment complications (13% vs. 1%) and unrelated causes (16% vs. 2%, p

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burstein, R., Aviv, A., Even-Zohar, N. G., Nachmias, B., Haran, A., Braun, M., … Shaulov, A. (2023). Comparing end-of-life care of hematologic malignancy versus solid tumor patients in a tertiary care center. European Journal of Haematology, 111(4), 528–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free