News verification by exploiting conflicting social viewpoints in microblogs

316Citations
Citations of this article
334Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Fake news spreading in social media severely jeopardizes the veracity of online content. Fortunately, with the interactive and open features of microblogs, skeptical and opposing voices against fake news always arise along with it. The conflicting information, ignored by existing studies, is crucial for news verification. In this paper, we take advantage of this "wisdom of crowds" information to improve news verification by mining conflicting viewpoints in microblogs. First, we discover conflicting viewpoints in news tweets with a topic model method. Based on identified tweets' viewpoints, we then build a credibility propagation network of tweets linked with supporting or opposing relations. Finally, with iterative deduction, the credibility propagation on the network generates the final evaluation result for news. Experiments conducted on a real-world data set show that the news verification performance of our approach significantly outperforms those of the baseline approaches.

References Powered by Scopus

Finding scientific topics

4956Citations
2830Readers
Get full text

Information credibility on Twitter

2090Citations
1727Readers
Get full text

Twitter under crisis: Can we trust what we RT?

831Citations
818Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jin, Z., Cao, J., Zhang, Y., & Luo, J. (2016). News verification by exploiting conflicting social viewpoints in microblogs. In 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2016 (pp. 2972–2978). AAAI press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10382

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 138

77%

Researcher 18

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 12

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 156

80%

Social Sciences 20

10%

Engineering 10

5%

Arts and Humanities 8

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0