Should screening for cervical cancer go to primary human papillomavirus testing and eliminate cytology?

19Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This review will systematically highlight the pros and cons of cervical cancer screening with HPV (human papillomavirus) testing and cytological methods (Papanicolaou (Pap) test). When comparing the screening modalities, various facets will be addressed, such as cost effectiveness, and harms and benefits across different demographics and age groups. It is important to note that due to the expansive variance in material costs, practices, and resource availability across different geographical regions, these comparisons are far from straight forward, and ultimately make it challenging to render definitive global recommendations. Thus, the intent of this review is to highlight some of the differences in difference cervical cancer screening modalities that can help one to choose an optimal screening method in their specific situation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Swid, M. A., & Monaco, S. E. (2022, July 1). Should screening for cervical cancer go to primary human papillomavirus testing and eliminate cytology? Modern Pathology. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-022-01052-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free