Endotoxin removal by end-line filters

15Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Four commonly used end-line filters, one with a charge-modified hydrophilic nylon filter (ELD96; Pall Biomedical Ltd., Portsmouth, United Kingdom), one with an unmodified nylon filter (FAE020; Pall Biomedical), and two with hydrophilic cellulose ester filters (Ivex-HP, Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.; Sterifix, Braun-Gelman, Brussels, Belgium), were evaluated for their endotoxin-removing capacity in saline and 5% glucose. Natural endotoxins derived from Escherichia coli 8739 and the lipopolysaccharide mutant Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA220-R2 and a purified E. coli serotype O111:B4 lipopolysaccharide preparation were used to challenge the four end-line filters. No endotoxin-removing capacity was observed for the Ivex-HP and Sterifix filters. Both the FAE020 and the ELD96 end-line filters showed excellent endotoxin-eliminating capacities in 5% glucose. Increasing the NaCl concentration in 5% glucose, however, greatly reduced the endotoxin-removing efficiency of especially the ELD96 filter for the purified E. coli lipopolysaccharide preparation. Obviously, both the nature of the endotoxin and the ionic strength of the solution had a major influence on the endotoxin end-line filtering efficiency.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vanhaecke, E., De Muynck, C., Remon, J. P., & Colardyn, F. (1989). Endotoxin removal by end-line filters. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 27(12), 2710–2712. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.27.12.2710-2712.1989

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free