How should trainee autonomy and oversight be managed in the setting of overlapping surgery?

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This case highlights an attending surgeon’s conflicts between duty to care for individual patients, train independent surgeons, and serve a patient population in an efficient manner. Although oversight of surgical residents and multiple operating room scenarios can be conducted in an ethical manner, patients might not understand the realities of surgical training and clinical logistics without explicit disclosure. Central to the ethical concerns of the case are the attending surgeon’s obfuscation of resident involvement and her insufficient oversight of two concurrent procedures. Full and proper informed consent, increased transparency, better planning, and improved communication could have prevented this difficult situation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gallant, J. N., & Langerman, A. (2018). How should trainee autonomy and oversight be managed in the setting of overlapping surgery? AMA Journal of Ethics, 20(4), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.4.ecas3-1804

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free