Influence of carbohydrate source and buffer on rumen fermentation characteristics, milk yield, and milk composition in early-lactation Holstein cows

98Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The effects of concentrate to forage ratio and sodium bicarbonate (buffer) supplementation on intake, ruminal fermentation characteristics, digestibility coefficients, milk yield, and milk composition were examined in 4 cannulated Holstein cows (100 ± 20 d in milk). A 4 × 4 Latin square design with 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments was implemented for 3-wk experimental periods. The 4 treatments were a 50:50 concentrate to forage ratio with 1.2% of dry matter (DM) and without added buffer and a 75:25 concentrate to forage ratio with (1.2% of DM) and without (0% of DM) buffer. The forage component of the ration was a 50:50 mixture of alfalfa and barley and triticale silage, and diets were fed ad libitum as a total mixed ration. Although feed intake was not influenced by treatments, substantial treatment differences were observed for milk yield and milk composition. Cows fed high-concentrate diet had lower ruminal pH, ruminal acetate, and butyrate concentrations, whereas propionate concentrations were significantly elevated. The addition of buffer, at both levels of concentrate inclusion, resulted in elevated total volatile fatty acids and acetate concentrations. We concluded that altering the forage concentrate ratio in the diet of lactation cows influenced milk yield and milk composition, but the addition of buffer to the diet prevented the elevation in trans-C18:1 fatty acids in milk fat, and related milk fat depression, associated with feeding high-concentrate diets.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kennelly, J. J., Robinson, B., & Khorasani, G. R. (1999). Influence of carbohydrate source and buffer on rumen fermentation characteristics, milk yield, and milk composition in early-lactation Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 82(11), 2486–2496. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75500-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free