Why we need a non-reductionist approach to trust

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I will underline the real complexity of trust (not for mere theoretical purposes but for advanced applications), and I will criticize some of those reductionist view of Trust. I will illustrate: how trust can be a disposition, but also is an 'evaluation', and also a 'prediction' or better an 'expectation'; and how it is a 'decision' and an 'action', and 'counting on' (relying) and 'depending on' somebody; and which is the link with uncertainty and risk taking (fear and hope); how it creates social relationships; how it is a dynamic phenomenon with loop-effects; how it derives from several sources. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castelfranchi, C. (2006). Why we need a non-reductionist approach to trust. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3986 LNCS, pp. 1–2). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11755593_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free