Impact and cost-effectiveness of women's training in home gardening and nutrition in Bangladesh

60Citations
Citations of this article
145Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study quantifies the impact and cost-effectiveness of training poor rural women in Bangladesh in home gardening and nutrition. We use baseline and follow-up data for 646 intervention and control households and apply a difference-in-difference estimator. We find that the intervention significantly (p < 0.01) increased vegetable production (+16.5 g/person/day), vegetable consumption and the micronutrient supply from the garden. Using the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) approach, we show that the intervention can be considered cost-effective in abating iron, vitamin A and zinc deficiencies. Home garden interventions can therefore make an effective contribution to addressing micronutrient undernutrition.

References Powered by Scopus

Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: How can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition?

1200Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding DALYs

484Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Home gardens: A promising approach to enhance household food security and wellbeing

355Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: What have we learned so far?

394Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tapping the economic and nutritional power of vegetables

217Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Farm diversification and food and nutrition security in Bangladesh: empirical evidence from nationally representative household panel data

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schreinemachers, P., Patalagsa, M. A., & Uddin, N. (2016). Impact and cost-effectiveness of women’s training in home gardening and nutrition in Bangladesh. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 8(4), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2016.1231704

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 57

65%

Researcher 23

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34

44%

Social Sciences 17

22%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16

21%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free