Prognostic relevance of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in patients with severe aortic stenosis

13Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims Although concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are frequently present in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), outcome data are scarce and treatment strategies are controversial. The aim of the present study was to assess the presentation and outcome of patients with AS and coexisting MR and TR. Methods Eighty-nine consecutive patients with severe AS and at least moderate MR (72 functional and 17 degenerative) and results were included and followed. Seventy-five patients were symptomatic at presentation. Sixty of these had severe symptoms (New York Heart Association class >_3). Nine additional patients had an indication for valve procedures during follow-up. However, 35 patients were managed conservatively. Isolated aortic valve intervention was performed in 29 patients (22 valve replacement and 7 transcatheter aortic valve replacement) and concomitant mitral valve surgery in 20 patients. For the assessment of outcome, overall survival (i.e. time from study entry to death from any cause) was assessed: adjusted survival was significantly higher for patients undergoing any valve procedure as compared with patients managed conservatively (P = 0.032). Surgical treatment of severe concomitant MR was associated with improved survival in an unadjusted population but did not reach statistical significance after propensity adjustment. 14 of 36 patients who had concomittant moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) underwent surgery of which 7 (50 %) died within 3 months postoperatively. On the other hand, only 1 of 35 (3%) with no or mild TR undergoing surgery died within 3 months post-operatively (P < 0.001). Conclusion Presence of MR in patients with severe AS characterizes a high-risk population. Timely aortic valve intervention confers a survival benefit and concomitant mitral valve surgery should be considered according to operative risk. The additional presence of significant TR is associated with dismal outcomes, regardless of the treatment strategy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zilberszac, R., Gleiss, A., Binder, T., Laufer, G., Grimm, M., Gabriel, H., … Rosenhek, R. (2018). Prognostic relevance of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in patients with severe aortic stenosis. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, 19(9), 985–992. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free