The Tipping of the Big Stone—And Life itself. Obesity, Moral Work and Responsive Selves Over Time

14Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Why is “everything I know is the right thing to do a million miles removed from what I do in reality?” This question posed by Rita, my main interlocutor and friend in a fieldwork that started in 2001–2003 and was taken up again in 2014–2015, opens up an exploration of moral work and moral selves in the context of the obesity epidemic and weight loss processes. I address these questions through the notion of “moral laboratories” taking up Mattingly’s argument that moral cultivation over time cannot be disconnected from a notion of self. Mattingly has consistently argued for a biographical and narrative self, which is processual and created in community. Along these lines, and by recourse to the German philosopher Bernhard Waldenfels’ phenomenology, I will propose the notion of a responsive self. The responsive self highlights the eventness of ongoing experimentation against the odds and captures equally pathic and agentive dimensions of a self that both persists and is transformed over time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grøn, L. (2017). The Tipping of the Big Stone—And Life itself. Obesity, Moral Work and Responsive Selves Over Time. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 41(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-017-9535-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free