From #occupy to #IdleNoMore: Rethinking space, settler consciousness and erasures within the 99%

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Postcolonial theory has been a relative latecomer to the cloistered world of international relations (IR). In 2002, Geeta Chowdhry and Sheila Nair’s edited volume Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations and LHM Ling’s Postcolonial International Relations both marked an important turn towards interrogating the ethnocentric, imperialising and racialised geographies of IR’s mainstream (see also Agathangelou and Ling, 2009; Doty, 1996; Grovogui, 2009; Henderson, 2007; Jones, 2006; Shilliam, 2011; Vitalis, 2010). A similar scholarship has emerged within nationality and citizenship studies in Canada (Bannerji, 2000; Razzaq, 2002; Thobani, 2007) and among indigenous scholars who directly challenge the problematics of sovereignty, racial formation and territorial consolidation as they relate to Anglo-American settler states (Amadahy and Lawrence, 2009; Anderson, 2001; Lawrence, 2004; Lawrence and Dua, 2005; Shaw, 2008; Smith, 2005; Tuhiwai Smith, 1999).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kilibarda, K. (2016). From #occupy to #IdleNoMore: Rethinking space, settler consciousness and erasures within the 99%. In Riot, Unrest and Protest on the Global Stage (pp. 301–321). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-30553-4_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free