The need of making decisions pervades every field of human activity. Several decision support methods and software tools are available in the literature, relying upon different modelling assumptions and often producing different results. In this paper we investigate the relationships between two such approaches: the recently introduced QuAD frameworks, based on the IBIS model and quantitative argumentation, and the decision matrix method, widely adopted in engineering. In addition, we describe Arg&Dec (standing for Argue & Decide), a prototype web application for collaborative decision-making, encompassing the two methodologies and assisting their comparison through automated transformation.
CITATION STYLE
Aurisicchio, M., Baroni, P., Pellegrini, D., & Toni, F. (2015). Comparing and integrating argumentation-based with matrix-based decision support in Arg&Dec. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9524, pp. 1–20). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.