SEMIO EM JOGO®: DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A PLAYFUL-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOR NURSING EDUCATION

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: to develop a playful-educational technology for learning Nursing Semiology and Semiotics, as well as to carry out the evaluation of its playability before and after implementing adjustments with undergraduate Nursing students. Method: a methodological study that followed the planning, prototyping and production stages corresponding to the first playable version for development. For the playability evaluation, 62 students were divided into two groups: one for to evaluate the preliminary version and the other for after implementing adjustments; and, for this, the Friedman test was used, which allows detecting differences between medians of more than two paired samples, considering p-value below 5% as statistical significance. Results: the game had three sequential phases: the first addressed vital signs; the second, biosafety measures; and the third, the physical examination. Referring to the playability evaluation, it was possible to observe that the “Concentration” and “Feedback” categories and the general median presented better evaluation scores after implementing adjustments. Conclusion: the current study sought to develop a technology that would allow students attending Bachelor’s degree courses in Nursing to sharpen their knowledge in Nursing Semiology and Semiotics. In addition to that, it was sought to evaluate the playability of Semio em Jogo®; thus, it was observed that the academic community considered the game satisfactory after the modifications as much as before implementing them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matias, L. D. M., Celestino, M. N. S., de Carvalho, M. A. P., Gouveia, B. de L. A., Ginú, I. L. D. N., Costa, M. M. L., & de Andrade, L. L. (2023). SEMIO EM JOGO®: DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A PLAYFUL-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOR NURSING EDUCATION. Texto e Contexto Enfermagem, 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2022-0324en

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free