Designing and comparing G2P-type lemmatizers for a morphology-rich language

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We consider the statistical lemmatization problem in which lemmatizers are trained on (word form, lemma) pairs. In particular, we consider this problem for ancient Latin, a language with high degree of morphological variability.We investigate whether general purpose stringto- string transduction models are suitable for this task, and find that they typically perform (much) better than more restricted lemmatization techniques/heuristics based on suffix transformations.We also experimentally test whether string transduction systems that perform well on one string-to-string translation task (here, G2P) perform well on another (here, lemmatization) and vice versa, and find that a joint n-gram modeling performs better on G2P than a discriminative model of our own making but that this relationship is reversed for lemmatization. Finally, we investigate how the learned lemmatizers can complement lexicon-based systems, e.g., by tackling the OOV and/or the disambiguation problem.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eger, S. (2015). Designing and comparing G2P-type lemmatizers for a morphology-rich language. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 537, pp. 27–40). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23980-4_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free