A critical assessment of the factors affecting reporter gene assays for promoter SNP function: A reassessment of -308 TNF polymorphism function using a novel integrated reporter system

54Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

One of the greatest challenges facing genetics is the development of strategies to identify functionally relevant genetic variation. The most common test of function is the reporter gene assay, in which allelic regulatory regions are used to drive the expression of a reporter gene, and differences in expression in a cell line after transient transfection are taken to be a reflection of the polymorphism. Many studies have reported small differences in single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-specific reporter activity, including the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) G-308A polymorphism. However, we have established that many variables inherent in the reporter gene approach can account for the reported allelic differences. Variables, such as the amount of DNA used in transfection, the amount of transfection control vector used, the method of transfection, the growth history of the host cells, and the quality and purity of DNA used, all influence TNF -308 SNP-specific transient reporter gene assays and serve as a caution for those researchers who apply this method to the functional assessment of polymorphic promoter sequences. We have developed an integrated reporter system that obviates some of these problems and shows that the TNF G-308A polymorphism is functionally relevant in this improved assay, thus confirming that the -308A allele expresses at a higher level compared with the -308G allele.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karimi, M., Goldie, L. C., Cruickshank, M. N., Moses, E. K., & Abraham, L. J. (2009). A critical assessment of the factors affecting reporter gene assays for promoter SNP function: A reassessment of -308 TNF polymorphism function using a novel integrated reporter system. European Journal of Human Genetics, 17(11), 1454–1462. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2009.80

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free