No Neuron Is an Island: A Neuroaesthetic Inquiry into Omer Fast’s Mimetic Interactions

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Neuroaesthetic research tends to support a form of Cartesian dichotomy between conscious and nonconscious processes. I propose that some artworks, considered in art contexts, can produce embodied forms of aesthetic knowledge that are inaccessible in the epistemological context of the fMRI lab. In my critical approach to neuroaesthetics, I trouble hierarchical dichotomies between conscious and nonconscious processes, positioning mind as a physiological process that is not isolated in a brain, but fully embodied and co-constitutive with worldly, social in-teractions. In this essay, I examine the neuroscientific literature on mirror neurons as it informs a critical neuroaesthetic analysis of Fast’s Talk Show, which in itself facilitates embodied forms of knowledge through reflexive, mimetic engagement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McKay, S. (2015). No Neuron Is an Island: A Neuroaesthetic Inquiry into Omer Fast’s Mimetic Interactions. In Contributions To Phenomenology (Vol. 73, pp. 315–330). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9379-7_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free