An empirical comparison of Bayesian and credal set theory for discrete state estimation

4Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We are interested in whether or not there exist any advantages of utilizing credal set theory for the discrete state estimation problem. We present an experiment where we compare in total six different methods, three based on Bayesian theory and three on credal set theory. The results show that Bayesian updating performed on centroids of operand credal sets significantly outperforms the other methods. We analyze the result based on degree of imprecision, position of extreme points, and second-order distributions. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karlsson, A., Johansson, R., & Andler, S. F. (2010). An empirical comparison of Bayesian and credal set theory for discrete state estimation. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 80 PART 1, pp. 80–89). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14055-6_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free