Assessing Meaning Components in German Complex Verbs: A Collection of Source–Target Domains and Directionality

3Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a collection to assess meaning components in German complex verbs, which frequently undergo meaning shifts. We use a novel strategy to obtain source and target domain characterisations via sentence generation rather than sentence annotation. A selection of arrows adds spatial directional information to the generated contexts. We provide a broad qualitative description of the dataset, and a series of standard classification experiments verifies the quantitative reliability of the presented resource. The setup for collecting the meaning components is applicable also to other languages, regarding complex verbs as well as other language-specific targets that involve meaning shifts.

References Powered by Scopus

Indexing by latent semantic analysis

9558Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perceptual symbol systems

4464Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy

3497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Constituents in multiword expressions: What is their role, and why do we care?

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Aiming with → arrows ← at particles: Towards a conceptual analysis of directional meaning components in German particle verbs

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cognitive and linguistic aspects of composition in German particle verbs

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schulte im Walde, S., Köper, M., & Springorum, S. (2018). Assessing Meaning Components in German Complex Verbs: A Collection of Source–Target Domains and Directionality. In NAACL HLT 2018 - Lexical and Computational Semantics, SEM 2018, Proceedings of the 7th Conference (pp. 22–32). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/s18-2003

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

68%

Researcher 5

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 22

73%

Linguistics 5

17%

Engineering 2

7%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free