Influencing Factors of Cutting Force for Apple Tree Branch Pruning

18Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Apple, which occupies the first position in the world with regard to its yield, is an important economic crop in China. Pruning of apple trees is still dominated by manual pruning, resulting in high labor costs and low efficiency. Additionally, there are some limitations with pruning machines. Thus, research regarding the mechanical properties of apple branches is the basis for the designing proper pruning machine. This paper aims to study the effect of the feed rate, cutting line speed, branch diameter, and moisture content on the cutting force. Results revealed that cutting force depended on the feed rate, cutting line speed, and branch diameter. Furthermore, both the cutting line speed and the branch diameter had a significant effect on the cutting force (p < 0.01), while the feed rate had a small effect on the cutting force (p > 0.05). However, the moisture content had no effect on the cutting force, with a difference of cutting force between samples with moisture content of 15% and 50% less than 5%. Based on the experiments performed, an equation relating the feed rate, the cutting line speed, the branch diameter was derived to calculate the cutting force. By verification test, it established that regression equation was valid with error less than 4%. This study explored the mechanical properties of apple branch, and obtained the optimal cutting parameters, which can provide a reference for the design of the pruning machine.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, C., Zhang, H., Wang, Q., & Chen, Z. (2022). Influencing Factors of Cutting Force for Apple Tree Branch Pruning. Agriculture (Switzerland), 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12020312

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

56%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

44%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0