Measurement of the energy intensity of human well-being and spatial econometric analysis of its influencing factors

13Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Current energy efficiency indicators (such as energy intensity) do not properly reflect the inherent relationship between “energy-environment-health”. Therefore, this study introduces the indicator of energy intensity of human well-being (EIWB) to depict the efficiency problem between energy consumption and residents’ health. In this paper, panel data of 30 provinces in mainland China from 2005 to 2016 is used to calculate the EIWB of each province and analyze its spatial distribution. Moreover, the effect of influencing factors on EIWB is investigated by using the spatial Durbin model. The results show that: (1) The EIWB presents a spatial agglomeration. The provinces with high EIWB mostly cluster in the northern China. (2) Industrial structure and energy structure have positive effects on EIWB in local area through increasing energy consumption and damaging residents’ health. (3) The effect of urbanization and income on local EIWB is significantly positive because it will promote energy consumption. (4) Industrial structure, health expenditure, foreign direct investment and technological progress have spatial spillover effects due to its significant impact on residents’ health in neighboring areas. Based on conclusions, the corresponding policy recommendations are proposed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Long, R., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., Wu, M., & Li, Q. (2020). Measurement of the energy intensity of human well-being and spatial econometric analysis of its influencing factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010357

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free