Performance Analysis of AES, Blowfish and Rijndael: Cryptographic Algorithms for Audio

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Normally people share data like text, image, audio or video with others using a computer network. When these media are transmitting through the computer network, it faces various security problems for any form of data: text, image, audio or video. Information security is a challenging job while data transmission; that is why cryptography is badly required in network security. Audio encryption is very important nowadays because most of the transaction is in the form of audio. There are various algorithms available for encryption–decryption symmetric as well as asymmetric. Comparison of the performance for selected algorithms (Blowfish, AES and Rijndael) is the purpose of this research. The result shows that Blowfish performs better than AES and Rijndael.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rathod, C., & Gonsai, A. (2021). Performance Analysis of AES, Blowfish and Rijndael: Cryptographic Algorithms for Audio. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1187, pp. 203–209). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6014-9_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free