Governors in Control: Executive Orders, State-Local Preemption, and the COVID-19 Pandemic

15Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The nation's governors took strong and decisive action in responding to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, often directly affecting their local governments. These actions allow us to examine this question: Will governors' actions in an unprecedented emergency situation centralize the authority of the state or rely on local governments to deal with localized problems? Additionally, what factors affect those decisions? We examine all governors' executive orders affecting local governments in the first five months of the 2020 pandemic. We find that preemption did occur, especially in the early months of the pandemic. States that gave their localities more autonomy were associated with preemption throughout the pandemic; the governor's party affiliation and her ideological match with local officials were associated with greater preemption in some phases of the pandemic but not others.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weissert, C. S., Uttermark, M. J., MacKie, K. R., & Artiles, A. (2021). Governors in Control: Executive Orders, State-Local Preemption, and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Publius. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjab013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free