The Association between N-terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels in the Umbilical Vein and Amniotic Fluid Volume Abnormalities

  • Ersoy A
  • Ozler S
  • Oztas E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

© 2016 by Thieme Publicações Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Purpose The amniotic fluid volume (AFV) is known as a predictor for the wellness of a fetus. We aimed to investigate whether N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) levels reflect AFV abnormalities in otherwise normal fetuses. Methods We recruited 24 women with isolated oligohydramnios, 23 women with isolated polyhydramnios, and 36 women with normal AFV at a tertiary referral center. NT-proBNP levels in umbilical venous samples and the individual characteristics of the three groups were compared. One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance were used for multi-group comparisons of continuous variables. When a significant difference was detected, the Scheffe test was performed as a post-hoc analysis. Proportions were compared using the Chi-square (χ2) test. Results Maternal age, body mass indices, weight gained in pregnancy and NT-proBNP levels were similar among the three groups. Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes significantly correlated with NT-proBNP levels in all newborns (Spearman’s r = 0.23; p = 0.03 and Spearman’s r = 0.24; p = 0.02, respectively). The umbilical venous NTproBNP levels did not differ between newborns who neededmechanical ventilation and those who didn’t (p = 0.595). Conclusions NT-proBNP is a biomolecule that may provide insights into the pathogenesis of fetal circulatory problems and subsequent renal failure. Further investigations are warranted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ersoy, A., Ozler, S., Oztas, E., Ersoy, E., Ergin, M., Erkaya, S., & Uygur, D. (2016). The Association between N-terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels in the Umbilical Vein and Amniotic Fluid Volume Abnormalities. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia / RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics, 38(04), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1583172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free