International nurse education leaders’ experiences of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study

20Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: To explore the experiences of strategic leads for nurse education as they sought to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: We utilised a qualitative interpretative approach to explore education leaders’ experiences of leading during the early months of the pandemic. Methods: Nineteen leaders with significant strategic responsibility for nurse education in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Singapore and the United Kingdom were identified via purposive sampling and agreed to participate. Interviews were held between May and July 2020. Results: Four overarching themes arose from the analysis: (1) Crisis driven adaptability & flexibility; (2) Responsive, complex and changing communication; (3) Making decisions for student and staff safety; (4) Looking to the future; stronger partnerships. Conclusion: Internationally, while nursing education leaders faced different problems, they shared a common goal amidst the crisis to remain student-centred. They demonstrated they were able to face major challenges, respond to large scale logistical problems and make decisions under significant and ongoing pressure. Impact: In responding to the pandemic, nurse leaders shared knowledge and offered mutual support. This bodes well for future collaboration. The move to online learning accelerated an existing trend and it seems likely that this will continue. Given the pressures they experienced over an extended period, the sector may wish to consider how it prepares and supports existing and future leaders.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ion, R., Craswell, A., Hughes, L., Johnston, A., Kilbride, L., Hubbard-Murdoch, N., & Massey, D. (2021). International nurse education leaders’ experiences of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77(9), 3797–3805. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14892

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free