Comparison of the prognostic accuracy of scoring systems, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and plasma biomarkers: A single-centre observational pilot study

56Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Current approaches to risk assessment before major surgery have important limitations. The aim of this pilot study was to compare predictive accuracy of preoperative scoring systems, plasma biomarkers, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) for complications after major non-cardiac surgery. Methods. Single-centre, observational study of patients aged ≥40 yr undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery. Before surgery, risk scores were calculated and blood samples collected for measurement of plasma biomarkers. Patients underwent CPET for measurement of anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak). After surgery, patients were followed for 28 days to evaluate complications and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Data are presented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with 95% confidence intervals. Results. A total of 100 patients were recruited between April 2009 and October 2010; 17 of whom did not proceed to surgery. CPET variables suggested good predictive accuracy for MACE [AT: AUROC 0.83 (0.69-0.96); VO2 peak AUROC 0.81 (0.69-0.96)] and poor predictive accuracy for all complications [AT: AUROC 0.64 (0.52-0.77); VO 2 peak AUROC 0.64 (0.52-0.77)]. There was a trend towards predictive accuracy of the plasma biomarkers B-type natriuretic peptide and estimated glomerular filtration rate (calculated from serum creatinine) for MACE but not all complications. C-reactive protein, ASA score, and revised cardiac risk index had little or no predictive value. Conclusions. These pilot data suggest that CPET and plasma biomarkers may improve risk assessment before surgery. Only large clinical studies can confirm this observation and define the optimal use of these tests in clinical practice. © 2013 © The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation

13787Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program

4278Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery

3029Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study

353Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a risk-assessment method in patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery: A systematic review

258Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)

212Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

James, S., Jhanji, S., Smith, A., O’Brien, G., Fitzgibbon, M., & Pearse, R. M. (2014). Comparison of the prognostic accuracy of scoring systems, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and plasma biomarkers: A single-centre observational pilot study. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 112(3), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet346

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

24%

Researcher 8

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 51

76%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

9%

Sports and Recreations 4

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free