Peformance of mean-frequency estimators for Doppler radar and lidar

160Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The performance of mean-frequency estimators for Doppler radar and lidar measurements of winds is presented in terms of two basic parameters: Φ, the ratio of the average signal energy per estimate to the spectral noise level; and Ω, which is proportional to the number of independent samples per estimate. For fixed Φ and Ω, the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) for unbiased estimators of mean frequency signal power, and spectral width are essentially independent of the number of data samples M. For large Φ, the estimators of mean frequency are unbiased and the performance is independent of M. For small Φ, the estimators are biased due to the effects of the uncorrelated noise (white noise), which results in uniformly distributed "bad' estimates. The friction of bad estimates is a function of Φ and M with weak dependence on the parameter Ω. For Doppler lidar and for large Φ, better performance is obtained by using many low-energy pulses instead of one pulse with the same total energy. For small Φ, the converse is true. -from Authors

Cited by Powered by Scopus

All-fiber multifunction continuous-wave coherent laser radar at 1.55 μm for range, speed, vibration, and wind measurements

205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Remote sensing of atmospheric wind velocities using solid-state and CO<sup>2</sup> coherent laser systems

155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coherent Doppler lidar measurements of wind field statistics

135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frehlich, R. G., & Yadlowsky, M. J. (1994). Peformance of mean-frequency estimators for Doppler radar and lidar. Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology, 11(5), 1217–1230. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<1217:pomfef>2.0.co;2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

59%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

23%

Researcher 4

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 12

55%

Physics and Astronomy 5

23%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 4

18%

Environmental Science 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free