Global and national trends, gaps, and opportunities in documenting and monitoring species distributions

37Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

AU Conserving: Pleaseconfirmthatallheadinglevelsarerepresentedcorrectly and managing biodiversity in the face of ongoing: global change requires sufficient evidence to assess status and trends of species distributions. Here, we propose novel indicators of biodiversity data coverage and sampling effectiveness and analyze national trajectories in closing spatiotemporal knowledge gaps for terrestrial vertebrates (1950 to 2019). Despite a rapid rise in data coverage, particularly in the last 2 decades, strong geographic and taxonomic biases persist. For some taxa and regions, a tremendous growth in records failed to directly translate into newfound knowledge due to a sharp decline in sampling effectiveness. However, we found that a nation’s coverage was stronger for species for which it holds greater stewardship. As countries under the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework renew their commitments to an improved, rigorous biodiversity knowledge base, our findings highlight opportunities for international collaboration to close critical information gaps.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oliver, R. Y., Meyer, C., Ranipeta, A., Winner, K., & Jetz, W. (2021). Global and national trends, gaps, and opportunities in documenting and monitoring species distributions. PLoS Biology, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001336

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free