Validation of a Case-Finding Algorithm for identifying patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in administrative claims databases

19Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the validity of a treatments- and tests-based Case-Finding Algorithm for identifying patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from claims databases. Data sources: Primary data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment (HIRE)-Oncology database and the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD) were collected between June 1, 2014, and October 31, 2015. Study design: A comparative statistical evaluation using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and other validity measures was used to validate the NSCLC Case-Finding Algorithm vs. a control algorithm. Data collection: Patients with lung cancer were identified based on diagnosis and pathology classifications as NSCLC or small-cell lung cancer. Records from identified patients were linked to claims data from Anthem health plans. Three-month pre-index and post-index data were included. Principal findings: The NSCLC Case-Finding Algorithm had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 compared with 0.53 in the control (p < 0.0001). Promising diagnostic accuracy was observed for the NSCLC Case-Finding Algorithm based on sensitivity (94.8%), specificity (81.1%), positive predictive value (PPV) (95.3%), negative predictive value (NPV) (79.6%), accuracy (92.1%), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (78.8). Conclusions: The NSCLC Case-Finding Algorithm demonstrated strong validity for distinguishing patients with NSCLC from those with SCLC in claims data records and can be used for research into NSCLC populations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turner, R. M., Chen, Y. W., & Fernandes, A. W. (2017). Validation of a Case-Finding Algorithm for identifying patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in administrative claims databases. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 8(NOV). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00883

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free