Marital history and the burden of cardiovascular disease in midlife

19Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study examines the effects of marital history on the burden of cardiovascular disease in midlife. With use of data from the 1992 Health and Retirement Study, a series of nested logistic regression models was used to estimate the association between marital history and the likelihood of cardiovascular disease. Results suggest that, in midlife, the continuously married and the never married are among the healthiest in cardiovascular outcomes. People with multiple marital losses are the most vulnerable group. People with multiple marital losses have a higher likelihood of cardiovascular disease and will need significant formal and informal care as they advance into old age. Copyright 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.

References Powered by Scopus

The precious and the precocious: Understanding cumulative disadvantage and cumulative advantage over the life course

512Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Marital status, marital transitions, and health: A gendered life course perspective

483Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The significance of socioeconomic status in explaining the racial gap in chronic health conditions

394Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Marital status, gender and cardiovascular mortality: Behavioural, psychological distress and metabolic explanations

164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The cumulative effect of unemployment on risks for acute myocardial infarction

145Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Marriage, Cohabitation, and Divorce in Later Life

95Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Z. (2006). Marital history and the burden of cardiovascular disease in midlife. Gerontologist, 46(2), 266–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.2.266

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

57%

Researcher 5

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

25%

Psychology 2

17%

Decision Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free