Long-term cardiovascular risk of hypertensive events in emergency department: A population-based 10-year follow-up study

15Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Hypertension-related visits to the emergency department (ED) are increasing every year. Thus, ED could play a significant role in detecting hypertension and providing necessary interventions. However, it is not known whether a hypertensive event observed in the ED is an independent risk factor for future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Methods A population-based observational study was conducted using a nationally representative cohort that contained the claim data of 1 million individuals from 2002 to 2013. We included non-critical ED visits without any history of MACE, and compared the new occurrences of MACE according to the presence of hypertensive events using extended Cox regression model. The disease-modifying effect of a follow-up visit was assessed by analyzing the interaction between hypertensive event and follow-up visit. Results Among 262,927 first non-critical ED visits during the study period (from 2004 to 2013), 6,243 (2.4%) visits were accompanied by a hypertensive event. The hypertensive event group had a higher risk of having a first MACE at 3 pre-specified intervals: 0–3 years (HR, 4.25; 95% CI, 3.83–4.71; P<0.001), 4–6 years (HR, 3.65; 95% CI, 3.14–4.24; P<0.001), and 7–10 years (HR, 3.20; 95% CI, 2.50–4.11; P<0.001). Follow-up visits showed significant disease-modifying effect at 2 intervals: 0–3 years (HR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.50–0.83) and 4–7 years (HR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.48–0.95). Conclusions A hypertensive event in the ED is an independent risk factor for MACE, and follow-up visits after the event can significantly modify the risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, S., You, C. youn, Kim, J., Jo, Y. H., Ro, Y. S., Kang, S. H., & Lee, H. (2018). Long-term cardiovascular risk of hypertensive events in emergency department: A population-based 10-year follow-up study. PLoS ONE, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191738

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free