Variability of sleep bruxism—findings from consecutive nights of monitoring

8Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine sleep bruxism (SB) behavior during five consecutive nights and to identify correlations between SB episodes per hour (SB index) and sleep-time masseter-muscle activity (sMMA). Material and methods: Thirty-one participants were included in the study. Of these, 10 were classified as sleep bruxers (group SB-1) and nine as non-sleep bruxers (group non-SB). The bruxism status of these 19 patients was identified by means of questionnaires, an assessment of clinical symptoms, and electromyographic/electrocardiographic data (Bruxoff® device). The remaining 12 participants were also identified as bruxers, but based exclusively on data from the Bruxoff device (group SB-2). Data analysis included descriptive statistics and Spearman’s correlation to assess the relationship between the SB index and sMMA. Results: Participants in group SB-1 showed an overall mean SB index of 3.1 ± 1.6 and a mean total sMMA per night of 62.9 ± 38.3. Participants in group SB-2 had an overall mean SB index of 2.7 ± 1.5 and a mean total sMMA of 56.0 ± 29.3. In the non-SB group, participants showed an overall mean SB index of 0.8 ± 0.5 and a mean total sMMA of 56.8 ± 30.3. Spearman’s correlation yielded values of − 0.27 to 0.71 for the correlation between sMMA and SB index. Conclusions: The data revealed variable SB activity and the absence of a reliable correlation between sMMA and the SB index. Clinical relevance: The high variation in SB activity and lack of correlation between sMMA and the SB index should be considered when diagnosing SB. Trial registration: Clinical Trials [NIH], clinical trial no. NCT03039985.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ohlmann, B., Bömicke, W., Behnisch, R., Rammelsberg, P., & Schmitter, M. (2022). Variability of sleep bruxism—findings from consecutive nights of monitoring. Clinical Oral Investigations, 26(4), 3459–3466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04314-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free