Apologizing for atrocity: Rwanda and recognition

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Apology is a necessary component of moral repair of damage done by wrongs against the person. Analyzing the role of apology in the aftermath of atrocity, with a focus on the genocide of the Tutsi in Rwanda, 1994, this chapter emphasizes the role of recognition failures in grave moral wrongs, the importance of speech acts that offer recognition, and building mutuality through recognition as a route to reconciliation. Understanding the US role in the international failure to stop the '94 genocide raises the question of how any response could mitigate a world-shattering wrong like genocide. With a focus on survivors, this chapter explains the concepts of recognition harm and spirit murder to illuminate what survivors experience and need. The third section develops a theory of apology as offering recognition to the victim of wrongdoing - through both the act of speakingto and through its content. The chapter examines US President Bill Clinton's 1998 apology to Rwandans, to understand it as an apology, and to see how it began reconciliation between Americans and Rwandans. The chapter concludes with a brief discussion of the inter-related significance of apology and material reparations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tirrell, L. (2013). Apologizing for atrocity: Rwanda and recognition. In Justice, Responsibility and Reconciliation in the Wake of Conflict (pp. 159–182). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5201-6_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free