Encircling band, laser retinopexy and lens removal as standard procedure in complicated retinal detachment shows a good clinical outcome

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abstract. Purpose: To evaluate vitrectomy in conjunction with the use of perfluorocarbon, cerclage, laser retinopexy, lens removal and silicone oil as surgical treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy associated with retinal detachment. Methods: Sixty-two eyes of 62 patients were treated for complicated retinal detachment following failed prior scleral buckling. Outcome measures were; retinal reattachment rate 6 months after silicone oil removal, status of the retina, visual acuity (VA), duration of silicone tamponade and frequency of reoperations. Results: The final reattachment rate was 95%. Reoperations had to be performed in 25% of patients. Eighty-one per cent of these patients received one and 19% two or more operations following silicone oil implantation. The mean time to reoperation was 1.8 ± 1.4 months. Silicone oil was removed after 5.6 ± 4.1 months following the last vitreoretinal procedure in 90%, respectively, 95% with attached retina. Five per cent experienced retinal detachment after silicone oil removal. At the end of follow-up, the mean VA was 0.13 ± 0.26 Snellen. Seventy per cent of patients achieved a vision of 20/200 or better (mean 0.25 ± 0.27). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates good final outcomes when a rigorous surgical approach was used. Furthermore, this standard procedure reduces the need for reoperations and consequently improves the functional outcome. © 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Acta Ophthalmol.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Velikay-Parel, M., Kiss, C. G., Ivastinovic, D., & Richter-Mueksch, S. (2011). Encircling band, laser retinopexy and lens removal as standard procedure in complicated retinal detachment shows a good clinical outcome. Acta Ophthalmologica, 89(7), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01763.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free