A Split-Mouth Design Comparison for Lateral and Crestal Sinus Lift Techniques with Dental Implants Placements: Short Communication

  • Al-Almaie S
  • Kavarodi A
  • Alorf A
  • et al.
8Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of implant placement and patient appraisal for two sinus lift techniques using both crestal and lateral techniques for bilateral sinus left in a split-mouth design. Introduction: All implants were successfully osseointegrated without any clinical complications or peri-implant radiolucency during the follow-up period of maximum 3 years. Methods: In terms of outcomes postoperative vertigo showed to be a major concern with the crestal approach, this approach is preferred over the lateral technique because of the reduced time required for the procedure and because it is less invasive. Results: Most patients preferred the crestal approach over the lateral approach due to the delay in implant placement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Almaie, S., Kavarodi, A. M., Alorf, A., & Alzahrani, S. (2017). A Split-Mouth Design Comparison for Lateral and Crestal Sinus Lift Techniques with Dental Implants Placements: Short Communication. The Open Dentistry Journal, 11(1), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601711010603

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free