Anti-Ageism for Gerontologists

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We argue that gerontologists are products of our ageist culture and that we both perpetuate ageism and suffer from internalized ageism ourselves. We make ageist comments, deny our own age, fail to teach students to recognize and confront ageism, and use language that authorizes and categorizes older people. Gerontologists are in ideal positions to confront ageism through our scholarly work, teaching, and community engagement. However, we suggest that, despite our deep gerontological knowledge, we do not have enough awareness, knowledge, and skills for taking anti-ageism actions in these arenas of our professional lives. We offer some suggestions for confronting ageism, including self-study, increasing content on ageism in the classroom and beyond, pointing out ageist language and behaviors to colleagues and students, working with diversity, equity and inclusion offices on campus, and giving careful consideration to our research approaches and academic writing. To go forward, we must increase awareness about ageism and gain skills in promoting anti-ageism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morrow-Howell, N., Kunkel, S., Gendron, T., Jarrott, S. E., & Andreoletti, C. (2023). Anti-Ageism for Gerontologists. Journal of Aging and Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2023.2194816

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free