From ornament to armament or loss of function? Breeding plumage acquisition in a genetically monogamous bird

13Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The evolution of conspicuous male traits is thought to be driven by female mate choice or male–male competition. These two mechanisms are often viewed as distinct processes, with most studies focusing on female choice. However, both mechanisms of sexual selection can act simultaneously on the same trait (i.e., dual function) and/or interact in a synergistic or conflicting way. Dual-function traits are commonly assumed to originate through male–male competition before being used in female choice; yet, most studies focusing on such traits could not determine the direction of change, lacking phylogenetic information. We investigated the role of conspicuous male seasonal plumage in male–male competitive interactions in the purple-crowned fairy-wren Malurus coronatus, a cooperatively breeding bird. Male breeding plumage in most Malurus species is selected by female choice through extra-pair mate choice, but unlike its congeners, M. coronatus is genetically monogamous, and females do not seem to choose males based on breeding plumage acquisition. Our study shows that, within groups, subordinate males that were older, and therefore higher-ranked in the queue for breeder position inheritance, produced a more complete breeding plumage. In line with this, subordinate males that were older and/or displayed a more complete breeding plumage were more successful in competitively acquiring a breeder position. A role as a signal of competitive ability was experimentally confirmed by presenting models of males: in breeding colours, these received more aggression from resident breeder males than in nonbreeding colours, but elicited limited response from females, consistent with competitors in breeding plumage being perceived as a bigger threat to the breeder male. The role of the conspicuous breeding plumage in mediating male–male interactions might account for its presence in this genetically monogamous species. As phylogenetic reconstructions suggest a past female choice function in M. coronatus, this could represent a sexual trait that shifted functions, or a dual-function trait that lost one function. These evolutionary scenarios imply that intra- and intersexual functions of ornaments may be gained or lost independently and offer new perspectives in understanding the complex dynamics of sexual selection.

References Powered by Scopus

Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4

58514Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance

7149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution

6769Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evolutionary drivers of seasonal plumage colours: colour change by moult correlates with sexual selection, predation risk and seasonality across passerines

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Female and male plumage colour signals aggression in a dichromatic tropical songbird

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

In love and war: The morphometric and phylogenetic basis of ornamentation, and the evolution of male display behavior, in the livebearer genus Poecilia

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fan, M., Teunissen, N., Hall, M. L., Hidalgo Aranzamendi, N., Kingma, S. A., Roast, M., … Peters, A. (2018). From ornament to armament or loss of function? Breeding plumage acquisition in a genetically monogamous bird. Journal of Animal Ecology, 87(5), 1274–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12855

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

80%

Researcher 5

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24

77%

Environmental Science 5

16%

Computer Science 1

3%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0