Is the care–education dichotomy behind us? Should it be?

24Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

FOR OVER A DECADE WE have talked about the care–education dichotomy as being false and irrelevant given that care is considered to be a part of education, not separate from it. A generation of early childhood professionals have grown up in services where care is seen as part of education. As a nation, Australia is now pursuing professionalisation of early childhood through the education discourse. As with any decision, there are positive and negative consequences. In this article I report on a research project that explores early childhood professionals’ perspectives of the care–education dichotomy, and the role it plays in early childhood today. I argue that, in order to understand the unintentional consequences of pursuing an educational pathway towards professionalisation, we need to keep the issues relating to care in the front of our minds.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sims, M. (2014). Is the care–education dichotomy behind us? Should it be? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(4), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911403900402

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free