On the robustness of the Hβ Lick index as a cosmic clock in passive early-type galaxies

9Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We examine the Hβ Lick index in a sample of ~24 000 massive (log(M/M⊙) > 10.75) and passive early-type galaxies extracted from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey at z < 0.3, in order to assess the reliability of this index to constrain the epoch of formation and age evolution of these systems. We further investigate the possibility of exploiting this index as 'cosmic chronometer', i.e. to derive the Hubble parameter from its differential evolution with redshift, hence constraining cosmological models independently of other probes. We find that the Hβ strength increases with redshift as expected in passive evolution models, and shows at each redshift weaker values in more massive galaxies. However, a detailed comparison of the observed index with the predictions of stellar population synthesis models highlights a significant tension, with the observed index being systematically lower than expected. By analysing the stacked spectra, we find a weak [N II] λ6584 emission line (not detectable in the single spectra) that anti-correlates with the mass, which can be interpreted as a hint of the presence of ionized gas. We estimated the correction of the Hβ index by the residual emission component exploiting different approaches, but find it very uncertain and model dependent. We conclude that, while the qualitative trends of the observed Hβ-z relations are consistent with the expected passive and downsizing scenario, the possible presence of ionized gas even in themostmassive and passive galaxies prevents us to use this index for a quantitative estimate of the age evolution and for cosmological applications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Concas, A., Pozzetti, L., Moresco, M., & Cimatti, A. (2017). On the robustness of the Hβ Lick index as a cosmic clock in passive early-type galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 468(2), 1747–1759. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx453

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free